agnothi seauton, y'all
Jun. 11th, 2007 11:25 amI find myself, more by accident than by design, listening to John Crowley’s reading of Aegypt: The Solitudes at the rate of one CD per night. This has gone on for only two nights and may stop at any time, not least because the book is ill-suited for pre-sleep. It is ideal for the long, otherwise boring drives to, say, Florida, where the straight road unrolls without variation and there are hours with the same dull patterns of tourists and long-distance trucks.
Then, one can give one’s whole attention to the words, letting sink in not just the rhythms or cadence but the varied messages and jokes and literary echoes. The damn thing unfolds more like a long poem than a long novel: drift just for a moment, and you have missed a key plot element encoded in a subordinate clause. Knowing in advance where the thing is going makes the semi-sleeper realize it will be necessary to wake up in the morning and read the passage in question, then re-listen to figure out why the connective plot-advancers slid by so easily. And why it would be better to listen during some activity that requires being fully awake.
The book’s set-ups of social context in the city remind me of one of the many reasons I thought of The Forbidden Forest when I first encountered the novel. But Eliade telegraphs his minor incidents and characters, at least as I now remember them; vast though the independent plotlines are in number, you have the feeling that you know which of them are done and won’t be coming back. This is not so with Aegypt even after you know what happens, and I suppose it was set up that way to permit maximum flexibility in later episodes while navigating steadily towards the intended conclusion. It works beautifully as a device, albeit one so intricate that I associate it more with poems (or with the sort of poems I was both reading and writing when I first encountered the novel).
The Gypsy’s fortune for Pierce, that he was faced with a “titanic sculpture … that would take far longer to complete than he had at first supposed,” of course turned out to be true for Crowley.
I am waiting to see what the Oracle @ Wi-Fi has to say to me this time round. I think I wrote already about this art project, in which Beth Lilly takes three cellphone photos after being requested for a reading, and transmits them to the questioner. The questioner then lets Lilly know what the unspoken question was, after which she attempts an interpretation.
As one would expect, the photos are sometimes uncannily related to the question and sometimes totally unconnected, and Lilly’s reading (she claims no psychic powers) is sometimes on target and sometimes not.
My question regarding upcoming changes in my life (I had a pretty clear idea of what might be coming but Lilly did not) was represented by a half-filled bottle of water discarded on the ground; more or less similar automobiles in a parking garage (but with one potentially significant anomaly); and a man trying to organize a group of other men on a street corner (with no clues as to what might be happening). I see I am reading a great deal more into my recollection of the images than appeared to me when they first hove into view on my computer screen, demonstrating again the process by which we make up our stories retrospectively.
So now I am waiting to get the images from the birthday reading (Lilly, like the Oracle @ Delphi who inspired the project, takes questions only on the 7th of the month, but there are so many it now takes her up to a week to get back to you).
The images from my previous reading are posted on the Oracle’s website: http://www.oracleatwifi.com/Orac277_1022.html
or right here:

Then, one can give one’s whole attention to the words, letting sink in not just the rhythms or cadence but the varied messages and jokes and literary echoes. The damn thing unfolds more like a long poem than a long novel: drift just for a moment, and you have missed a key plot element encoded in a subordinate clause. Knowing in advance where the thing is going makes the semi-sleeper realize it will be necessary to wake up in the morning and read the passage in question, then re-listen to figure out why the connective plot-advancers slid by so easily. And why it would be better to listen during some activity that requires being fully awake.
The book’s set-ups of social context in the city remind me of one of the many reasons I thought of The Forbidden Forest when I first encountered the novel. But Eliade telegraphs his minor incidents and characters, at least as I now remember them; vast though the independent plotlines are in number, you have the feeling that you know which of them are done and won’t be coming back. This is not so with Aegypt even after you know what happens, and I suppose it was set up that way to permit maximum flexibility in later episodes while navigating steadily towards the intended conclusion. It works beautifully as a device, albeit one so intricate that I associate it more with poems (or with the sort of poems I was both reading and writing when I first encountered the novel).
The Gypsy’s fortune for Pierce, that he was faced with a “titanic sculpture … that would take far longer to complete than he had at first supposed,” of course turned out to be true for Crowley.
I am waiting to see what the Oracle @ Wi-Fi has to say to me this time round. I think I wrote already about this art project, in which Beth Lilly takes three cellphone photos after being requested for a reading, and transmits them to the questioner. The questioner then lets Lilly know what the unspoken question was, after which she attempts an interpretation.
As one would expect, the photos are sometimes uncannily related to the question and sometimes totally unconnected, and Lilly’s reading (she claims no psychic powers) is sometimes on target and sometimes not.
My question regarding upcoming changes in my life (I had a pretty clear idea of what might be coming but Lilly did not) was represented by a half-filled bottle of water discarded on the ground; more or less similar automobiles in a parking garage (but with one potentially significant anomaly); and a man trying to organize a group of other men on a street corner (with no clues as to what might be happening). I see I am reading a great deal more into my recollection of the images than appeared to me when they first hove into view on my computer screen, demonstrating again the process by which we make up our stories retrospectively.
So now I am waiting to get the images from the birthday reading (Lilly, like the Oracle @ Delphi who inspired the project, takes questions only on the 7th of the month, but there are so many it now takes her up to a week to get back to you).
The images from my previous reading are posted on the Oracle’s website: http://www.oracleatwifi.com/Orac277_1022.html
or right here: